1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1998 Ford Falcon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (235 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1998 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2800 mm |