1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML (275 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | ML |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4266 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |