1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 1998 Rover 420 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 936 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1998 Rover 420 has manual transmission. 1998 Rover 420 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Rover 420 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | 62 | 420 |
Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1189 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2750 mm |