1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Seat Bolero
To start off, 1998 Seat Bolero is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Seat Bolero (350 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (325 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Seat Bolero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Seat Bolero | |
| Make | Cadillac | Seat |
| Model | 62 | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1959 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 350 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
