1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1999 Acura CL. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 638 kg more than 1999 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | 62 | CL |
Year Released | 1959 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 150 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 65 L |