1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Adventure
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 748 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Adventure.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Adventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Chevrolet Adventure | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Adventure |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1470 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2690 mm |
