1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 200 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3510 mm |