1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 GMC Yukon. (283 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Yukon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 72 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Yukon. (481 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Yukon.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | 62 | Yukon |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 5964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 481 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 2290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2950 mm |