1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | HRT |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |