1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Hummer H1
To start off, 2000 Hummer H1 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Hummer H1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2000 Hummer H1. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Hummer H1.
Because 2000 Hummer H1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 583 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Hummer H1 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
| Model | 62 | H1 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6381 cc | 6500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 583 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3310 mm |
