1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Lada Vaz
To start off, 2000 Lada Vaz is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 2000 Lada Vaz. (81 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Vaz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1173 kg more than 2000 Lada Vaz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Vaz is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Vaz will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 466 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Vaz. (117 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Vaz.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Lada Vaz | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | 62 | Vaz |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2500 mm |