1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 551 kg more than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | 62 | Sable |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |