1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2000 Opel Meriva is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2000 Opel Meriva. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Meriva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 775 kg more than 2000 Opel Meriva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2000 Opel Meriva has manual transmission. 2000 Opel Meriva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | 62 | Meriva |
Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 53 L |