1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Pininfarina Rossa
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa (485 HP) has 288 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Rossa should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2000 Pininfarina Rossa has manual transmission. 2000 Pininfarina Rossa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Pininfarina Rossa | |
| Make | Cadillac | Pininfarina |
| Model | 62 | Rossa |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 5472 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 485 HP |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2510 mm |
