1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 BMW Z3
To start off, 2001 BMW Z3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z3. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 739 kg more than 2001 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2001 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | 62 | Z3 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 51 L |