1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Impala (200 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 553 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Impala |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1572 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |
