1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2001 Mahindra Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2001 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 125 kg more than 2001 Mahindra Armada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2001 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 2001 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
Model | 62 | Armada |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4310 mm |