1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 780 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |