1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz A
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. (95 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1095 kg more than 2001 Mercedes-Benz A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2001 Mercedes-Benz A has manual transmission. 2001 Mercedes-Benz A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Mercedes-Benz A | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | A |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 54 L |