1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 313 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer. (382 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer has manual transmission. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 71 L |