1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2001 Nissan MM is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 383 kg more than 2001 Nissan MM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan MM. (372 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan MM.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | 62 | MM |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 106 L |
