1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2001 Toyota RunX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 2001 Toyota RunX. (104 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota RunX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1138 kg more than 2001 Toyota RunX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 442 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota RunX. (141 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | RunX |
Year Released | 1959 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 84.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |