1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Acura RL
To start off, 2002 Acura RL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RL (225 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2002 Acura RL.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Acura RL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | 62 | RL |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3472 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 225 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |