1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Honda Passport
To start off, 2002 Honda Passport is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 135 more horse power than 2002 Honda Passport. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda Passport.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Passport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Passport. (256 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Passport.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Honda Passport | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Passport |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 583 Nm | 256 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2710 mm |