1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 719 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Compass |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2660 mm |