1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Toyota F-1
To start off, 2002 Toyota F-1 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2002 Toyota F-1. (183 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota F-1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 515 kg more than 2002 Toyota F-1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2002 Toyota F-1 has manual transmission. 2002 Toyota F-1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Toyota F-1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | F-1 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |