1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Volvo S80
To start off, 2002 Volvo S80 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 660 kg more than 2002 Volvo S80.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | S80 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |