1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Ford Focus
To start off, 2003 Ford Focus is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2003 Ford Focus. (108 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Focus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 925 kg more than 2003 Ford Focus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Focus has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Focus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Ford Focus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Focus |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |