1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (390 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 698 kg more than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2003 Jaguar X-Type has manual transmission. 2003 Jaguar X-Type will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | 62 | X-Type |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1502 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 61 L |