1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | SL |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |