1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 345 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 875 kg more than 2003 Pagani Zonda.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2003 Pagani Zonda has manual transmission. 2003 Pagani Zonda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Cadillac | Pagani |
| Model | 62 | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 542 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2055 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2730 mm |
