1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Tata E
To start off, 2003 Tata E is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2003 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 751 kg more than 2003 Tata E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2003 Tata E has manual transmission. 2003 Tata E will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Tata E | |
Make | Cadillac | Tata |
Model | 62 | E |
Year Released | 1959 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2810 mm |