1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Toyota RAV4

To start off, 2003 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2003 Toyota RAV4. (145 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota RAV4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 940 kg more than 2003 Toyota RAV4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota RAV4. (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota RAV4. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2003 Toyota RAV4 has manual transmission. 2003 Toyota RAV4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Cadillac 62 2003 Toyota RAV4
Make Cadillac Toyota
Model 62 RAV4
Year Released 1959 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6381 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 325 HP 145 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 583 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2218 kg 1278 kg
Vehicle Length 5720 mm 4210 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 57 L