1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Acura RSX
To start off, 2004 Acura RSX is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2004 Acura RSX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 978 kg more than 2004 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Acura RSX | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | 62 | RSX |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1222 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |