1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Citroen Xsara

To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 878 kg more than 2004 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (255 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Cadillac 62 2004 Citroen Xsara
Make Cadillac Citroen
Model 62 Xsara
Year Released 1959 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6381 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 325 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 583 Nm 255 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 18.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2218 kg 1340 kg
Vehicle Length 5720 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 54 L