1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 805 kg more than 2004 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2004 Citroen Xsara has manual transmission. 2004 Citroen Xsara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Citroen Xsara | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | 62 | Xsara |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |