1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2490 mm |