1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2004 GMC Sierra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2004 GMC Sierra. (300 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 512 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62.
Because 2004 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Sierra. (489 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2004 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | 62 | Sierra |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 583 Nm | 489 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 2730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 6030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 4250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 129 L |