1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Discovery (217 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Discovery should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2004 Land Rover Discovery.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Land Rover Discovery | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Discovery |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 217 HP |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 93 L |