1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz S (494 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz S.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | S |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 5441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 494 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 88 L |