1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2004 SsangYong Musso is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2004 SsangYong Musso. (220 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 SsangYong Musso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 312 kg more than 2004 SsangYong Musso. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 SsangYong Musso. (318 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2004 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Cadillac | SsangYong |
Model | 62 | Musso |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 73 L |