1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2004 Subaru Forester is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Subaru Forester. (162 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 705 kg more than 2004 Subaru Forester. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | 62 | Forester |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 162 HP |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
