1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Toyota Yaris
To start off, 2004 Toyota Yaris is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Yaris. (64 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Yaris. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1303 kg more than 2004 Toyota Yaris. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Yaris, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 493 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Yaris. (90 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Yaris.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Toyota Yaris | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Yaris |
Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 66.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |