1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1681 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1959 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Westfield |
| Model | 62 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1959 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 6382 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2320 mm |
