1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.
1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3010 mm |