1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 748 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2218 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 59 L |