1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Musso is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 2005 SsangYong Musso. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 SsangYong Musso.
Because 2005 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 338 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 SsangYong Musso. (245 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2005 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Cadillac | SsangYong |
Model | 62 | Musso |
Year Released | 1959 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6381 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 583 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 22.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5720 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |