1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2006 Chrysler 300 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler 300 (246 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 310 kg more than 2006 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | 62 | 300 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 246 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |