1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Isuzu KB

To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Cadillac 62 (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (126 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1959 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 318 kg more than 2006 Isuzu KB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Cadillac 62 (583 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1959 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB. 1959 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2006 Isuzu KB has manual transmission. 2006 Isuzu KB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1959 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1959 Cadillac 62 2006 Isuzu KB
Make Cadillac Isuzu
Model 62 KB
Year Released 1959 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6381 cc 2405 cc
Horse Power 325 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 583 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 98.4 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 2218 kg 1900 kg
Vehicle Length 5720 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 3060 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 76 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]