1959 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1959 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1959 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | LR3 |
Year Released | 1959 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6382 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2125 kg | 2461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5730 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 86 L |